Generous Play is Everyone’s Job

These four modes are far from all-encompassing, but I wanted to talk about generous play because it is what I, personally, strive for and seek. This is not the only way to play, an I am absolutely not pushing it onto anyone who wants other types of fun (including undepicted ones, like competitive play or tangential play or the like).

(Though I think selfish play sucks)

This is probably the tip of a future iceberg because in naming generous play, it becomes something I can speak to in terms of best practices, tips and tricks. These are not all-purpose suggestions, but rather they are things which might be useful if you also seek generous play.

This is on my mind due to some strange conversations afoot about the role of GM. I don’t want to delve into them too deeply because I think the specific conversations have gone pretty far off the rails, but the underlying topics regarding the GM’s role at the table and their relationship with fun are important. There are absolutely cases out there where the nature of the role in a game has a warping effect on the social rules surrounding play, and you can end up with tyrant GMs who use their position as a blunt instrument to maintain authority.

This is a bad thing. And games are not going to solve it. When this happens, there is a much deeper social breakdown going on, and games are just the arena of choice. That is not going to instantly become a healthy group if they switch over to cross country skiing.

But games might help keep us from getting to that space. Often is it born from a model of received play – the players are there to be entertained, and the GM is there to provide the entertainment. This seems benign enough, but it sets up a scarcity-based model where the players rely on the GM for their fun, and thus the GM may give or withdraw that fun as a tool of power. This is obviously messed up, but if it’s your only exposure to a play dynamic, it may not be obvious how brittle a threat that is.

Most GMs I know are personally inclined towards generous play, even if they’re the only person at their table who is. I would go further to say that this tendency is essential to GMing being a healthy, engaging pastime rather than something more like a job or authority role. If the GM is not finding her fun in her player’s fun, then she needs to find it somewhere else, and those somewhere else’s are kind of sketchy.

Critically, most of my favorite players also subscribe to this model. They’re there to have fun, and they engage the rest of the table to help drive that fun. If you get a table full of people playing this way it can be a joy to watch as the fun-ball gets passed around with vigorous enthusiasm, and the desire to elevate each other elevates the whole table.

BUT.

(Because of course there’s a but)

This is MUCH MUCH easier to say or intend than it is to *do*. If you turn to someone and say “Hey, play more generously!” they will be rightly puzzled as to what exactly you’re asking and how that could even be done. Generous play requires trust, confidence and bravery as foundations, and even if you have those things, it then requires practice to do well. it’s a skill. a hard skill. But as a skill it can be learned.

So when I talk about the tip of an iceberg? The rest of that iceberg is going to be about learning that skill. Partly for my own sake – talking through this stuff is good for me – but hopefully it will be of use to others.

5 thoughts on “Generous Play is Everyone’s Job

  1. Greg Sanders

    These concepts make sense and I do think are a useful theoretical addition. Two quick thoughts:

    1) I think, especially because of its downsides, it’s worth noting that most games with significant out of game prep element probably have some received play. Some of the techniques address these imbalances fit the generous play model, e.g. sharing responsibility for fleshing out the game world, recaps. Others may be more in the ethical received play realm, spread responsibilities for things like scheduling rather than having a GM administrator/authority, pay for games and scenarios, show gratitude where appropriate.

    2) Competition/cooperation may be a different axis rather than a different mode of play. It’s possible to be generous in competitive play (though it does add complications). Likewise, there are many example in MMORPGs and the like of selfish play in cooperative games, where people get ragged on for not sufficient DPS or the like.

    Regardless, good concepts.

    Reply
    1. Blue

      Not sure if it’s “generous competition”, but I love designing killer encounters, and then at the table cheering as my players overcome them in clever, imaginative, and daring ways.

      I design one way because I love real risk as a player, but I’m the player’s biggest cheerleader and enabler by saying “yes” when running and at the table.

      Reply
  2. Pingback: Generous Play | Fictive Fantasies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.